Hero workflow

Before approving any request, ask Sam@samplify.ai.

An email-shaped interface for a category-defining problem. No new tab. No new login. The decision comes back inside the workflow you already use.


The questions Sam answers

Every angle of your estate. Checked in minutes, not weeks.

Ask any procurement question in plain language. Sam checks it against your stack, the live software market, your policy and your contracts. Then returns an answer with sources.

Do we already own something that does this?
Which approved tools meet these requirements?
Should we renew this?
Can we consolidate this?
What evidence supports the recommendation?
Does this tool really do what it claims?

Plays nicely

What we are not. What we work with.

Samplify isn't another SAM tool, procurement tool or EA tool. It reads from each of them and gives the approver a defensible answer before the workflow advances.

We are not a SAM tool. We work with every SAM tool.

Flexera · Snow · ServiceNow SAM Pro · Apptio · Ivanti · USU

Your SAM tool tells you what you own and what you're paying for it. Samplify uses that ground truth to answer whether you should keep paying for it.

The catalog stays where it lives. Samplify reads from it.

We are not a procurement tool. We feed every procurement tool.

Coupa · Ariba · Zip · Workday · ServiceNow Procurement

Your procurement tool runs the request, the approval, and the contract. Samplify gives the approver a defensible answer before the workflow advances.

Samplify lives one step before the PR. The PO is still raised in your system of record.

We are not an EA tool. We use what your EA tool already knows.

LeanIX · Ardoq · ServiceNow CMDB · Mega · Software AG

Your EA tool holds the application taxonomy, the capability map, the lifecycle stage. Samplify reads it as the spine for every comparison.

No new architecture model. No re-mapping. The EA picture you already maintain is the one Samplify reasons against.


The answer shape

Ten real questions. Ten defensible answers.

The same workflow whether the verb is BUY, RENEW, REPLACE or REJECT. Stylised from real Sam decisions. Vendor names real, internal numbers fictional.

FROMEA Lead
TOsam@samplify.ai
Answered in 2m 18s

Should we approve a Notion Enterprise rollout for 800 seats?

Sam @ Samplify
Reject

Confluence and Jira already cover 88% of the requested capabilities for 9,600 licensed users. The remaining 12% (lightweight wiki, project boards) is met by Confluence Whiteboards, live since the November release. Estimated avoided spend: $312k year one.

Sources Atlassian admin · CMDB · Notion proposal · Capability matrix
FROMCIO Office
TOsam@samplify.ai
Answered in 3m 04s

Should we approve ChatGPT Enterprise for 4,200 knowledge workers?

Sam @ Samplify
Reject

M365 E5 already includes Copilot for all 4,200 users in scope. Adoption is 38%. A usage problem, not a licence problem. A second AI assistant would add $2.5M/year for capability already paid for. Recommend Copilot enablement programme instead.

Sources M365 admin centre · Copilot usage report · Vendor proposal
FROML&D Lead
TOsam@samplify.ai
Answered in 1m 47s

Approve Loom Business for the enablement team, 240 seats?

Sam @ Samplify
Reject

Stream and Clipchamp ship inside the existing E5 entitlement and cover screen capture, trim, transcript and SharePoint hosting. Two pilot teams already use Stream for the same workflow. Avoided spend: $74k/year.

Sources E5 entitlement · Stream usage · Loom proposal · L&D request
FROMFinOps Director
TOsam@samplify.ai
Answered in 2m 51s

Calendly renewal is up. Should we renew at 1,180 seats?

Sam @ Samplify
Replace

M365 Bookings is already entitled and covers external scheduling, round-robin and team availability. 96% feature parity for the booked use cases. Migrate over a quarter and recover $186k/year. Two teams have already self-migrated.

Sources Coupa renewal · Bookings entitlement · Feature matrix · Pilot data
FROMSAM Analyst
TOsam@samplify.ai
Answered in 4m 12s

We have 47 Confluence plugins on the renewal list. Which should we keep?

Sam @ Samplify
Replace

12 plugins are now native in Confluence Cloud (whiteboards, databases, smart links). 4 duplicate Lucidchart functionality already licensed. 9 have under 5% MAU. Consolidating to 22 active plugins recovers $241k/year and reduces audit surface.

Sources Atlassian Marketplace · Plugin MAU · Lucidchart contract
FROMIntegration Lead
TOsam@samplify.ai
Answered in 3m 28s

Zapier renewal. Should we move to the Team plan at $39k/year?

Sam @ Samplify
Replace

Power Automate is included in E5 and covers 87% of the active 142 Zaps. Of the remaining 13%, 6 connectors are on the Power Automate roadmap for Q3. Migration effort estimated at 6 engineering weeks; payback inside one renewal cycle.

Sources Zapier audit log · Power Automate connectors · E5 entitlement
FROMPMO Lead
TOsam@samplify.ai
Answered in 2m 39s

Marketing wants Asana for 320 seats. Approve?

Sam @ Samplify
Replace

Monday.com is the approved standard for project work and already supports 1,840 users across Ops and RevOps. The features cited in the request (timeline, workload, forms) are at parity. Onboard the marketing team to the existing tenant. No new contract.

Sources Monday.com tenant · EA standards register · Asana request
FROMCompliance Lead
TOsam@samplify.ai
Answered in 3m 17s

Do we have anything that maps our AI usage to EU AI Act categories?

Sam @ Samplify
Buy

No tool in the stack covers Annex III risk classification or model registry obligations. ServiceNow GRC handles policy but not model inventory. With the August 2026 high-risk deadline, this is a real gap. Recommend shortlist of three vendors; PoV scope drafted.

Sources ServiceNow GRC scope · Stack inventory · EU AI Act Annex III
FROMPlatform SRE Lead
TOsam@samplify.ai
Answered in 3m 56s

Datadog renewal at $4.1M. Replace with Azure Monitor or renew?

Sam @ Samplify
Renew

Azure Monitor covers 71% of in-scope features but lacks the APM and security signal correlation 14 production teams depend on. Migration cost (engineering + risk window) exceeds three-year savings. Renew, but at -8% on negotiated band using the Q4 commit lever.

Sources Datadog usage · Azure Monitor capability · Migration cost model
FROMCustomer Ops
TOsam@samplify.ai
Answered in 3m 33s

Salesforce Service Cloud renewal. Keep or move to Dynamics?

Sam @ Samplify
Renew

480 agents, 92% adoption, top-quartile case-resolution time. Workflow depth (Omni-Channel, Einstein routing) materially exceeds Dynamics in the configured use cases. Renew on the three-year band; growth allowance negotiated to 8% from 14%.

Sources Service Cloud usage · Adoption metrics · Dynamics gap analysis

Ask Sam on any surface

Sam meets your team where they already work.

Email, Microsoft Teams, ServiceNow, or any shared mailbox your team already uses for software requests. No new tab, no new login, no new security review, no new tool to roll out. Sam plugs into the governance process you already run.

Channel 01

Email

Send to sam@samplify.ai

A defensible answer comes back with sources and a verb. Forward it. Reply to refine it. The thread becomes the audit trail.

No setup. No integration. The starting point for every Samplify deployment.

Channel 02

Microsoft Teams

Tag @Sam in a thread

Ask whether the requested tool is a duplicate. The answer arrives alongside the conversation. The decision happens where the request lives.

The ask, the rebuttal, the verb, the source trail, all in one place.

Channel 03

ServiceNow

Attached before approval advances

A Samplify check rides on every request ticket. A defensible answer travels with the request.

Works alongside ServiceNow SAM Pro, ServiceNow Procurement, and ServiceNow GRC.

Channel 04

Your shared mailbox

Route Sam into design.authority@yourdomain.com

Anyone who already writes to that address can now ask Sam. The mailbox just got smarter.

No process change. No new login. Same address the team already uses.

Onboarding

The fastest setup in enterprise software. Up and running in the time it takes you to send us an Excel of your stack.

One file. No integration. No vendor onboarding. No data warehouse project.

The shape of every answer

01

Verb

Buy Renew Replace Reject
02

Reasoning

"M365 E5 already includes Copilot for all 4,200 users in scope. A second AI assistant adds $2.5M a year for capability already paid for."

03

Evidence

88% feature overlap. 38% adoption. $312k year-one avoided spend.

04

Sources

M365 admin centre  ·  Copilot usage  ·  Vendor proposal  ·  IT-security review

Whether it arrives in an inbox, a Teams thread or a ServiceNow ticket, the shape is the same. The decision is portable.


Four decision verbs

One framework. Four verbs. Zero ambiguity.

Every Samplify answer ends in one of four moves. No "it depends." No 40-page briefing. A verb, a rationale, a source.

Buy

New capability, no overlap

The request fills a gap nothing in the stack covers. Approve it, log the rationale, set a renewal review.

Renew

Continued value, no better option

Usage justifies the contract. No approved alternative meets the feature bar. Renew at the negotiated band.

Replace

Equivalent or stronger tool already approved

A tool you already own meets or exceeds the requested capability. Switch to what's approved and recover the spend.

Reject

Duplicate spend, policy conflict, or weak fit

The request fails the substitutability test, security review or budget rationale. Block it with the audit trail attached.


Weeks → Minutes

A simple software question shouldn't be a mini internal project.

Today
Request
Find owners
Compare tools
Debate evidence
Decision
Weeks
With Samplify
Ask Sam
Stack check
Feature match
Sourced action
Minutes

Try it yourself

The easiest way to understand it is to try it.

That's why we offer 30 days, free. Start by sending Sam an email.

Start your 30-day proof See who's using it