By role
EA, SAM, Procurement and FinOps each ask the software stack a different question. Samplify gives all four the same defensible answer.
"Does this fit the target architecture and approved stack?"
Every request runs against the reference architecture, the approved-tools list and the active deprecation roadmap. EA sees policy conflicts before procurement signs.
"Do we already own something equivalent?"
Sam runs the substitutability check feature-by-feature, not category-by-category. SAM finds duplicates the inventory tool can't see, and stops them at the request stage.
"Should we approve, reject, negotiate or redirect?"
Every request comes back with a verb (BUY · RENEW · REPLACE · REJECT), the rationale and the audit-ready source trail. Negotiations start from a defensible position.
"What spend can we avoid, consolidate or prioritise?"
Quarterly spend reviews stop being archaeology. The consolidation plays Samplify surfaces show up before the renewal, when they're still actionable.
Why one platform
Today, EA, SAM, Procurement and FinOps each see one slice of the decision. The duplicate purchase happens because none of them sees all of it.
EA sees architecture. SAM sees inventory. Procurement sees the contract. FinOps sees the invoice. None of them sees the substitutability question. The one that determines whether the request is duplicate spend.
By the time the four teams stitch their views together, the contract is signed and the spend is committed.
Samplify is the layer where the four views converge. Every request goes through one workflow, every answer carries the full context, every stakeholder sees the same evidence.
The decision is made before the contract, not reverse-engineered after.
Try it yourself
The 30-day proof runs across EA, SAM, Procurement and FinOps simultaneously. One workflow. Four perspectives. One verdict.